This story has been ricocheting around the blogosphere this week, and I’ve been sitting here wordlessly trying to figure out what to say about it. There really are no words. Or others have found better words than what I’ve been able to come up with.
Here’s the summary.
A Dutch diplomat and his wife have given up a seven-year-old South Korean girl they adopted as a baby, saying they had failed to integrate her into their family, consulate officials in Hong Kong said Monday.
The couple, whose names were not released, made the move in the last few months, seven years after they adopted her, a South Korean consulate spokesman told AFP.
“They now have their own children. They decided it was difficult to raise her because of cultural shock. They said she’s not willing to eat their food. That’s one of the reasons. It’s a strange reason,” said the spokesman, who did not want to be named.
“She was raised from a very early age. It’s a very uncommon case. It’s a difficult situation for us to understand,” he said, adding that the couple had adopted the child when the diplomat was working in South Korea.
If you have the stomach to read more, it gets worse, more bizarre and more heartbreaking. I’d recommend reading what Sume has to say.
Resist Racism discusses it here and here. Ungrateful Little Bastard has a thorough listing of documents on the story. Harlow’s Monkey wrote a brilliant response, as usual. And Julia’s post is compassionate, insightful, and devastating.
Edited to add Paula’s incredibly articulate POV.
One of the links that shocked me the most was this link from Harlow’s Monkey. I stared at it for a long time. I really could not fathom that it was real, and not a spoofy kind of joke from The Onion. But it’s real. If you’re not satisfied with how your adoption turned out, you can seek restitution! Even after forty years!
Sorry, Mom, if you’re suffering from Adoption Disappointment, you’re eight years too late.
December 14, 2007 at 10:46 am
The whole thing turns my stomach.
As far as the adoptiongonewrong.com web site. Here’s one question I have: what about parenting a child by birth and not getting what you want? Why should that be any different? Can’t you sue a Dr.? Or God??? For being misled, after all.
I mean, come on. There should be guarantees — or maybe warrantees is the better word — on kids, just like there are on toasters, microwaves, vacuums, etc. Maybe 40 years is stretching it a bit much, but possibly at least through 10 years. 18? I’m not sure. I suppose we’ll have to get some child development experts in one this discussion.
But I see no reason why parents can’t sue when their bio children aren’t up to par too.
December 14, 2007 at 11:22 am
I came here to comment on your previous post about the white van because it was bugging me all night last night. Will you keep us in the loop with whatever happens next (if anything)?
There’s an article about Newsweek this week on disruption, too. We really need to do a better job of screening/preparing adoptive parents. Although this little girl? Doesn’t sound like RAD was ever an issue. I don’t know. The whole thing just makes me stupid, stupid heavy and sad.
December 14, 2007 at 2:05 pm
Judy, there actually was a case I remember reading about a few years ago where a couple gave birth to a child with severe disabilities. They then turned around and sued the doctor saying he did not do a good job in informing them of the risk. I think they actually won their case.
December 14, 2007 at 2:17 pm
What a sad, sick, sordid story. Really, these people should be parents to no one; not only have they destroyed this young girl’s childhood (and possibly her life), but the damage done to their biological children will be huge as well.
None of these children will escape unscathed; maybe, just maybe, Jade will have a chance once she’s out of this poisonous situation.
Sume’s post is excellent. Thanks for providing the links.
December 14, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Children are not PETS! They cannot “be returned!” This is beyond the beyond. Sooo sickened.
December 14, 2007 at 8:26 pm
I see what you are saying but re: the wrongful adoption, is that the adoptive parents were purposefully misled, yet another reason for open records, in fact the reason I received my records was exactly because of a case like this. They made an uniformed decision and more than likely the child suffered for this lack of knowledge too.
December 27, 2007 at 5:25 pm
That site ‘Adoption gone wrong’ should be reported to U.N.’s Childrens’ Rights Convention
May 6, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Hi Everyone. I put my child for adoption 16 yrs ago she came back her adopted mother send her back to me she could not deal with her. adopted mom went through a
divorce and she just did not care.